The Subjection of Women and Slavery Essay -- Women’s Rights, Philosoph

In this first unit, one of the readings that re exclusivelyy caught my attention was John Stuart hang arounds The Subjection of Women. In his essay, Mills presents a in truth compelling argument that the subordination of one sex to another is equipment casualty and that there should be instead, perfect equality amongst the sexes. Having previously studied closely gender inequality issues from another class, I have a commodious understanding of how and why gender inequality has been perpetuated finished various historical, political, and well-disposed contexts. Incorporating this knowledge as well as information learned through the readings and lectures, I hope to share my thoughts on the subjection of women and its relationship to thrall in this personal response paper.As an advocate for womens rights and suffrage, the Utilitarianism cod of Mill had a profound influence in his writing and it is very(prenominal) much evident in this essay. Mill felt that the oppressions of p eople of some(prenominal) kind cannot possibly bring about the greatest benefit to baseball club (which is the central point to the Utilitarianism theory). The subordination of the weaker sex to the stronger rests upon theory only. There is no evidence to support the idea that one sex is superior everywhere another as Mill expresses in the quote below.The adoption of this arranging of inequality never was the result of deliberation, or forethought, or any social ideas, or any notion whatever of what conduced to the benefits of humanity or the impregnable order of ships company (Mill, 1995, pg.11). This idea of gender superiority/inferiority is middling a social construct of oppression. There are no earthshaking differences between man and women (besides biologically) that signifies their superiority/inferiority other than what only society believes them ... ... issues of oppression in which classifications such as race, class, and gender are all interconnected. Because of h istorical discrimination, societies have operated in a way that favors certain individuals everyplace another. In this case, it would be that of men over women because of their supposed superiority in physical strength (overlooking other attributes such as moral set and intelligence). This made me reflect on how the perspectives of sex and love have really changed over time as well as how influential two strength and power were in the shaping of the roles of men and women throughout history. kit and caboodle CitedMill, J. S. (1995). The subjection of women. In R. Stewart (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Sex and Love (pp. 11-17). newfangled York, New York Oxford University Press, Inc.Soble, A. A history of the philosophy of sex and love. (p. 22).