.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Comparriosn Of Erik Thoery And Kohlbergs Theory

Kohlberg s theory of moral tuition atomic number 18 designed to admit certain criteriaOn a qualitative level , they ar contrary ways of thinkingThey are structured wholesThe show up of the microscope constitutes is an invariant sequenceThey are hierarchicalThey are universal across culturesKohlberg uses these stages to condone other cognitive forms particularly the ability to take roles . In the pre-conventional stage children do not know that there are other pedestals on every subject They accept the viewpoint only of the dominance figure . They recognize contrary opinions and viewpoints in the second stage but gravitate towards those views that they themselves hold . mountain become concerned with the feelings of others during the third and fourth stages . During the last devil stages their worldview set forths to i nclude plurality from other communities and stems . They can invest with the opinions and feelings of `other people because no law considered absolute and fork up . Law is a pretend and a contractKohlberg s theory has been utilize in education to suffice children become active participants in their own moral development . Children are encouraged to converse and debate moral issues and return to conclusions on their own .
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
iodin of the major criticisms of this theory lies with post-conventional stage . Critics have felt that it would be dangerous for people to beat their individual(a) values over group val ues and would be disruptive to communities .! Carol Gilligan criticises the theory on the basis that it is different path of moral development . phallic development emphasizes means magic spell women emphasize affiliationErikson and Kohlberg have some(prenominal) provided important theories that expand on the theories of their predecessors . Erikson s theory emphasizes social interactions while Kohlberg s theory emphasises individual ideas and rights . Erikson s ego identity finds fruition in a feeling of social interactions while Kohlberg s ego identity...If you necessity to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment